Investigating the impact of flow rate and moisture content for different concentration of liquid desiccant solution

Authors

  • Hussain H. Mahdy
  • Abdulsalam D. M. Hassen Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Wasit University
  • Mohammed Ghalib Al-Azawy Doctor, Mechanical Eng.Dept - Wasit University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/ejuow.Vol11.Iss1.346

Keywords:

Desiccant column, dehumidification, regeneration process, calcium chloride solution.

Abstract

The desiccant air conditioning system consists of two processes, namely cooling and dehumidification, in which the air temperature and humidity are controlled in order to provide comfortable thermal conditions. A typical system includes a dehumidifier, indirect evaporative cooler, and regenerator. The desiccant is selected depending on its ability to absorb water vapor present in the air. In this study, calcium chloride solution was used as a desiccant for the desiccant solution regeneration process, and a flat plate solar collector was employed. Different variables, such as the primary air flow rate, desiccant flow rate, and the concentration of the desiccant solution, were changed during the experiments. The impact of these variables on the performance parameters of the desiccant system such as moisture removal rate, moisture efficiency, enthalpy efficiency, sensible heat ratio, and the mass transfer coefficient was studied. The obtained results revealed that as the solution concentration and the flow rate of primary air increase, the moisture removal rate, sensible heat ratio, and mass transfer coefficient increase. A particular value of inlet primary air flow rate (0.18Kg/s), an increase in the inlet concentration of calcium chloride solution from 0.85 to 0.95 leads to a rise in moisture removal rate, sensible heat ratio, and mass transfer coefficient of  (1.1 _1.65) g/s,  (0.18-0.25),  and  (0.01075-0.0123) m/s respectively. While at a certain inlet concentration of a desiccant solution (0.95), increasing the inlet primary air flow rate from 0.1Kg/s to 0.18Kg/s leads to an increase in the moisture removal rate, sensible heat ratio, and mass transfer coefficient o (0.94-1.26) g/s, (0.24-0.26), and(0.0038 -0.011) m/s respectively.

References

Elhelw M. (2016). Performance Evaluation for Solar Liquid Desiccant Air Dehumidification System. Alexandria Eng J;55(2): 933–940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2016.02.021

Jradi M and Riffat S. (2014). Energy Performance of an Innovative Liquid Desiccant Dehumidification System with a Counter-Flow Heat and Mass Exchanger Using Potassium Formate. Renew Bioresour;2(1): 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7243/2052-6237-2-5

Rafique MM, Rehman S, Alhems LM, et al. (2018). A Liquid Desiccant Enhanced Two Stage Evaporative Cooling System-Development and Performance Evaluation of a Test Rig. Energies;11(72): 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010072

Mesquita LCS, Harrison SJ and Thomey D. (2006). Modeling of Heat and Mass Transfer in Parallel Plate Liquid-Desiccant Dehumidifiers. Sol Energy;80(11): 1475–1482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2006.03.003

Ware III JD. (2013). A Low-Cost-Solar Liquid Desiccant System for Residential Cooling. m Sc Thesis, Florida State Univ.

Gao WZ, Cheng YP, Jiang AG, et al. (2015). Experimental Investigation on Integrated Liquid Desiccant - Indirect Evaporative Air Cooling System Utilizing the Maisotesenko - Cycle. Appl Therm Eng;88: 288–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.08.066

Ou X, Cai W, He X, et al. (2018). Experimental Investigations on Heat and Mass Transfer Performances of a Liquid Desiccant Cooling and Dehumidification System. Appl Energy;220(March): 164–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.087

Tu M, Ren CQ, Zhang LA, et al. (2009). Simulation and Analysis of a Novel Liquid Desiccant Air-Conditioning System. Appl Therm Eng;29(11–12): 2417–2425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.12.006

Bassuoni MM. (2014). Analytical Modeling and Performance Study of a Cross Flow Air Dehumidifier Using Liquid Desiccant. Adv Mater Res;875–877: 1205–1213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.875-877.1205

Amer O, Boukhanouf R and Ibrahim HG. (2015). A Review of Evaporative Cooling Technologies. Int J Environ Sci Dev;6(2): 111–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2015.V6.571

Lai L, Wang X, Kefayati G, et al. (2021). Evaporative Cooling Integrated with Solid Desiccant Systems: A Review. Energies;14(18): 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185982

Rafiqu MM, Gandhidasan P and Bahaidarah HM. Emerging Energy Efficient Thermally Driven HVAC Technology: Liquid Desiccant Enhanced Evaporative Air Conditioning. In: Desiccant Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning Systems. Springer, Singapore. pp. 229--256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3047-5_9

Elsarrag E. (2007). Moisture Removal Rate for Air Dehumidification by Triethylene Glycol in a Structured Packed Column. Energy Convers Manag;48(1): 327–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.04.013

Saman WY and Alizadeh S. (2002). An Experimental Study of a Cross-Flow Type Plate Heat Exchanger for Dehumidification/Cooling. Sol Energy;73(1): 59–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(01)00078-0

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

Issue

Section

Mechanical Engineering

How to Cite

Mahdy, H. H., Hassen , A. D. M., & Al-Azawy, M. G. (2023). Investigating the impact of flow rate and moisture content for different concentration of liquid desiccant solution. Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(1), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.31185/ejuow.Vol11.Iss1.346