Seismic Performance Evaluation of Mid-Rise RC Buildings Considering Soil–Structure Interaction and Foundation Effects

Authors

  • Issa Musawi University Of Wasit, Civil Engineering Department.
  • Asad H. Aldefae University of Wasit image/svg+xml
  • Karrar Al-Lami University of Wasit image/svg+xml
  • K.I.M Ismail Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/wjes.Vol14.Iss3.924

Keywords:

SSI, Seismic Performance, Raft Foundation, Finite Element Analysis

Abstract

This study evaluates the seismic performance of an existing seven-story reinforced concrete parking garage (85 m × 50 m plan) that was not originally designed for seismic loads. The structure, featuring flat slabs, ordinary shear walls, and a circular vehicular ramp, is currently supported on bearing piles. Three-dimensional finite-element time-history analyses were conducted in Plaxis 3D using the local Halabja 2017 Mw 7.3 acceleration record. Parametric investigations compared the existing pile system against alternative raft foundations with plan dimensions of 1.1B, 1.5B, and 2B, where B = 50 m on both the actual four-layer site soil and an idealized soft-soil profile; a fourteen-story variant was also analyzed to examine height effects. Results show that the 14-story model on soft soil with the smallest raft (1.1B) exhibited the most critical response: roof displacement reached 26.5 cm, inter-storey drift peaked at 1.61 %, and the fundamental period lengthened to 2.46 s. Conversely, increasing the raft size to 2B reduced displacement and drift toward the fixed-base values (e.g., 7-storey site-soil displacement dropped from 7.0 cm.at 1.1B to 6.8 cm at 2B versus 6.5 cm fixed-base). Base shear followed an inverse trend, decreasing with soil flexibility but recovering toward the fixed-base level as raft stiffness increased. It is recommended that raft foundations be sized at least 1.5B–2B for mid-rise RC structures on deformable soils to limit SSI-induced period lengthening and drift amplification; explicit 3D SSI analysis should be mandated for seismic assessment of existing non-seismic buildings in seismically active regions such as Iraq.

References

[1] G. Gazetas and G. Mylonakis, “Seismic soil-structure interaction: new evidence and emerging issues,” Geotech. Spec. Publ., no. 75 II, pp. 1119–1174, Dec. 1998.

[2] J. P. Stewart, R. B. Seed, and G. L. Fenves, “Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical findings,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 38–48, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1(38). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1(38)

[3] T. Balendra and A. C. Heidebrecht, “Influence of different sites on seismic base shear of buildings,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 623–642, Jul. 1986, doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290140410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290140410

[4] M. A. Ghannad, A. Amiri, and S. F. Ghahari, “Effects of soil-structure interaction on response of structures subjected to near-fault earthquake records,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1020, no. 1, pp. 642–649, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1063/1.2963896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2963896

[5] J. Rajasankar, N. R. Iyer, B. Y. Swamy, N. Gopalakrishnan, and P. Chellapandi, “SSI analysis of a massive concrete structure based on a novel convolution/deconvolution technique,” Sadhana, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 215–234, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1007/s12046-007-0019-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-007-0019-5

[6] B. Alavi and H. Krawinkler, “Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 687–706, May 2004, doi: 10.1002/eqe.369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.369

[7] M. A. Adam, O. A. Kamal, and M. El-Hoseny, “Variation of seismic response of mid-rise RC buildings due to soil structure interaction effects,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. (IJCIET), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 220–240, 2016.

[8] K. Galal and M. Naimi, “Effect of soil conditions on the response of reinforced concrete tall structures to near-fault earthquakes,” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 541–562, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1002/tal.365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.365

[9] J. P. Stewart, R. B. Seed, and G. L. Fenves, Empirical Evaluation of Inertial Soil-Structure Interaction Effects, Report No. PEER-98/07, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley, Nov. 1998.

[10] S. Ismail, F. Kaddah, and W. Raphael, “Assessing the Dynamic Behaviour of Midrise Frame Structures Sitting on Silty Sandy Soil,” Open Civ. Eng. J., vol. 14, pp. 262–288, 2020, doi: 10.2174/1874149502014010262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149502014010262

[11] S. Carbonari, F. Dezi, and G. Leoni, “Nonlinear seismic behaviour of wall-frame dual systems accounting for soil–structure interaction,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1651–1672, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1002/eqe.1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1195

[12] A. J. Al-Taie and B. S. Albusoda, “Earthquake hazard on Iraqi soil: Halabjah earthquake as a case study,” Geodesy and Geodynamics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 196–204, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.geog.2019.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2019.03.004

[13] M. S. Farman and A. I. Said, “Updated Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for Iraq/2018,” Civil Eng. J., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1610–1628, 2018, doi: 10.28991/cej-0309199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-0309199

[14] H. Abbas and M. Th. Al-hadidi, “Effect of Halabjah Earthquake on Al-Wand Earth Dam: Numerical Analysis,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 318, p. 01016, 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131801016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131801016

[15] ASCE/SEI, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.

[16] U.S. Geological Survey, “M 7.3 - 29 km S of Halabjah, Iraq,” USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, Event ID: us2000bmcg, 12 Nov. 2017.

[17] E. A. M. S. Al-Heety, “A complete and homogeneous magnitude earthquake catalogue of Iraq,” Arabian J. Geosci., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 4727–4732, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s12517-013-1131-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1131-y

[18] Ministry of Construction and Housing, Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control, Iraqi Seismic Code Requirements for Buildings (ISC-2017), Baghdad, Iraq, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Civil Engineering

How to Cite

Musawi, I., Asad H. Aldefae, Al-Lami, K., & K.I.M Ismail. (2026). Seismic Performance Evaluation of Mid-Rise RC Buildings Considering Soil–Structure Interaction and Foundation Effects. Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 14(3), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.31185/wjes.Vol14.Iss3.924