Numerical Analysis of Sectional Shape Effect on Behavior of Short Concrete Columns

Authors

  • Adil Mahdi Jabbar Civil Engineering Department, Wasit University
  • Lubna Salim Danha Civil Department, University of Technology
  • Qais Abdulmajeed Hasan Civil Department, University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/ejuow.Vol12.Iss1.524

Keywords:

short column, section shape, numerical analysis, loading capacity, longitudinal displacement.

Abstract

Abstract

This paper numerically investigates the effect of sectional shape on the structural behavior of short concrete columns when subjected to axial loading. Seven concrete columns that possess the same cross-sectional area, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, tie-bar diameter, and spacing are analysed via Abaqus software. The concrete compressive strength is equal for all columns. The loading is applied at the plastic centroid of the cross-section. The results show that the plus-shaped cross-sectional column sustains the highest load, while the T-shaped section bears the lowest loading. The plus-shaped, square, rectangular, and circular columns endure a higher loading than the T-shaped ones by 12.3 %, 10.7 %, 10.7 %, and 8.7 %, respectively. Concerning the longitudinal displacement, the T-shaped column exhibits the highest shortening, while the octagonal section shows the minimum shortening. Failure of all columns occurs due to the yielding of the longitudinal bars, followed by a fracturing of the concrete. All columns roughly show the same cracking load, while the T-shaped section exhibits a higher displacement than others at the cracking state, followed by an L-shaped column. However, all other columns show the same longitudinal displacement at the cracking load.

References

J. B. Keller, “The shape of the strongest column,” Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 275–285, 1960, doi: 10.1007/BF00252909.

J. Niu, W. Xu, J. Li, and J. Liang, “Influence of Cross-Sectional Shape on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete Canvas and CFRP-Reinforced Columns,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/5541587.

C.-K. Wang, C. G. Salmon, and J. A. Pincheira, Reinforced Concrete Design, Seventh Ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons, INC., 2007.

A. Bahrami and A. M. Kouhi, “Load Capacity and Failure Modes of Axially and Eccentrically Loaded Thin-Walled Steel Tubular Slender Columns Filled with Concrete,” vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 517–524, 2020.

S. F. Mokhtar, N. Hasanah, and A. Shukor, “Effects of Ties Distributions on Short Column Strength,” Proj. Res., p. 10.

A. M. El-Kholy and H. A. Dahish, “Improved confinement of reinforced concrete columns,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 717–728, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2015.06.002.

A. Shafqat and A. Ali, “Lateral Confinement of RC Short Column,” Sci.Int.(Lahore), vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 371–379, 2012.

T. S. S. Hoshitha, T. C. Rao, and T. D. G. Rao, “Effect of lateral confinement on short columns under uni-axial compression,” in International Conference on Smart Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 2020, vol. 020015, no. December, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.1063/5.0032063.

L. Jacob, “The Effect of Confinement Spacing on the Load Carrying Capability of Short Column,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 6, no. 06, pp. 1–3, 2018.

M. Abd-Elhamed, “Combined Effect of Stirrup Volumetric Ratio With Vertical Steel Bars on the Behavior of R.C. Columns Under Axial Loads,” J. Al-Azhar Univ. Eng. Sect., vol. 15, no. 57, pp. 1025–1045, 2020, doi: 10.21608/auej.2020.120370.

H. R. Salehian, A. Kheyroddin, S. Branch, and C. E. Faculty, “Shape and Dimensional Effect on Behavior of Concrete Columns Confined with FRP sheets,” in 3rd International Conference on Concrete & Development / CD06-003 SHAPE, 2009, no. 1, pp. 891–902.

S. Afzal and B. Singh, “Effects of Sections Shape on Performance of RCC Columns Under Concentric and Uniaxial-Eccentric Loading,” no. 2, pp. 472–477, 2022.

A. H. N. Almamoori, F. H. Naser, and M. K. Dhahir, “Effect of section shape on the behaviour of thin walled steel columns filled with light weight aggregate concrete: Experimental investigation,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 13, p. e00356, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm. 2020.e00356.

C. Ibañez, D. Hernández-Figueirido, and A. Piquer, “Shape effect on axially loaded high strength CFST stub columns,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 147, pp. 247–256, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.04.005.

S. W. N Razvi and M. G. Shaikh, “Effect of confinement on behavior of short concrete column,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 20, pp. 563–570, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.084.

D. S. Simulia, Getting Started with Abaqus: Interactive Edition, 6.12., vol. 6.12. Netherlands: Dassault Systèmes, 2012 Abaqus, 2012.

A. M. Jabbar, M. J. Hamood, and D. H. Mohammed, “Impact of Dilation Angle and Viscosity on the Ultra-High Performance Concrete Behavior in Abaqus,” ICASEA 2021 - 3rd 2021 Int. Conf. Adv. Sustain. Eng. its Appl., pp. 125–130, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICASEA53739.2021.9733087.

ABAQUS, “ABAQUS Version 6.10-1 Analysis User’s Manual,” Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., vol. III, pp. 1–679, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://130.149.89.49:2080/v6.10/pdf_books/ANALYSIS _3.pdf%0Ahttp://www.simulia.com/products/%0Ahttp://130.149.89.49:2080/v6.10/pdf_books/ANALYSIS_3.pdf%0Ahttp://www.simulia.com/products/%0Ahttp://130.149.89.49:2080/v6.10/pdf_books/ANALYSIS_3.pdf%0Ahttp://w.

Technical Committee CEN/TC250, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-2: General rules, vol. 1, no. 2005. Brussels: EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-05

How to Cite

Mahdi Jabbar, A. ., Salim Danha , L. ., & Abdulmajeed Hasan , Q. . (2024). Numerical Analysis of Sectional Shape Effect on Behavior of Short Concrete Columns. Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 12(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.31185/ejuow.Vol12.Iss1.524