the Digital-Image Dimension Reduction Via Analysis of Principal component
digital image
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/ejuow.Vol10.Iss2.304Keywords:
image processing,PCA,SVDAbstract
An Image with high-resolution is associated with huge size data space because each information of the image is arranged into 2D picture elements' values, each of them containing its associated value of the RGB bits. The depiction of picture data makes it challenging to distribute picture files using the Internet. For Internet users, the time it takes to upload and download photos has all time been the main concern. A high-resolution image takes up more storage space, in addition to the data transit difficulty. The Analysis of Principal Component, or PCA for a brief notation, is a mathematical approach utilized to lessen the data dimensionality. It extracts the main pattern of a linear system using the factoring matrices technique. The objectives of this paper are to see how effective PCA is in reducing digital picture features and to investigate the (feature-reduced) images’ quality on comparison with different values of the variance. As per the synthesizing of the initial research, the dimension or size reduction technique through the Analysis of Principal Component typically involves of 4-important steps: (1) picture-data normalizing (2) matrix of the covariance calculating using picture-data. (3) discovering the picture-data projection (with fewer number of features) to a new basis use the Single Value Decomposition technique (SVD) (4) determining the picture-data projection (with fewer number of characteristics) to a new basis. According to testing results, the PCA approach considerably decreases the size of picture data while sustaining the original picture’s fundamental properties. This approach reduced file size by 35.3 percent for the best feature lowered quality. The upload time of picture files through the Internet has substantially improved, particularly for mobile device downloads.
References
Gelogo, Y. E., & Kim, T. H. (2013). Compressed images transmission issues and solutions. Int J Comput Graph, 5(1), 1-8.
Kokovin, V. A., Uvaysova, S. S., & Uvaysov, S. U. (2016, May). Lossless compression algorithm for use in telecommunication systems. In 2016 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Lin, P. C., Pai, Y. H., Chiu, Y. H., Fang, S. Y., & Chen, C. C. P. (2016, March). Lossless compression algorithm based on dictionary coding for multiple e-beam direct write system. In 2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (pp. 285-288). IEEE.
Dzhagaryan, A., & Milenkovic, A. (2015, October). On effectiveness of lossless compression in transferring mHealth data files. In 2015 17th International Conference on E-health Networking, Application & Services (HealthCom) (pp. 665-668). IEEE.
Wandelt, S., Sun, X., & Zhu, Y. (2016). Lossless compression of public transit schedules. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(11), 3075-3086.
Vallathan, G., & Jayanthi, K. (2015, December). Lossless compression based on hierarchical extrapolation for biomedical imaging applications. In 2015 International Conference on Microwave, Optical and Communication Engineering (ICMOCE) (pp. 146-149). IEEE.
Moore, B. (1981). Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE transactions on automatic control, 26(1), 17-32.
Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis for special types of data (pp. 338-372). Springer New York.
Tzeng, J. (2013). Split-and-combine singular value decomposition for large-scale matrix. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013.
Shi, H. (2009, August). Application of principal component analysis to general contracting risk assessment. In 2009 ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management (Vol. 3, pp. 53-56). IEEE..
Tzimiropoulos, G., Zafeiriou, S., & Pantic, M. (2011, March). Principal component analysis of image gradient orientations for face recognition. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG) (pp. 553-558). IEEE.
Li, H. (2016). Accurate and efficient classification based on common principal components analysis for multivariate time series. Neurocomputing, 171, 744-753.
Kamencay, P., Trnovszky, T., Benco, M., Hudec, R., Sykora, P., & Satnik, A. (2016, May). Accurate wild animal recognition using PCA, LDA and LBPH. In 2016 ELEKTRO (pp. 62-67). IEEE.
Santo, R. D. E. (2012). Principal Component Analysis applied to digital image compression. Einstein (São Paulo), 10, 135-139.
Du, Q., & Fowler, J. E. (2008). Low-complexity principal component analysis for hyperspectral image compression. The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 22(4), 438-448.
Lee, C., Youn, S., Jeong, T., Lee, E., & Serra-Sagristà, J. (2015). Hybrid compression of hyperspectral images based on PCA with pre-encoding discriminant information. IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters, 12(7), 1491-1495.
Wang, C. W., & Jeng, J. H. (2012, November). Image compression using PCA with clustering. In 2012 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications Systems (pp. 458-462). IEEE.
Vaish, A., & Kumar, M. (2015, March). WDR coding based image compression technique using PCA. In 2015 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC) (pp. 360-365). IEEE.
Lim, S. T., Yap, D. F. W., & Manap, N. A. (2014, September). Medical image compression using block-based PCA algorithm. In 2014 International Conference on Computer, Communications, and Control Technology (I4CT) (pp. 171-175). IEEE.
Wu, M. S. (2014). Genetic algorithm based on discrete wavelet transformation for fractal image compression. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 25(8), 1835-1841.
Hussain, A. J., Al-Jumeily, D., Radi, N., & Lisboa, P. (2015). Hybrid neural network predictive-wavelet image compression system. Neurocomputing, 151, 975-984.
Prabhu, K. M. M., Sridhar, K., Mischi, M., & Bharath, H. N. (2013). 3-D warped discrete cosine transform for MRI image compression. Biomedical signal processing and control, 8(1), 50-58.
Prabhu, K. M. M., Sridhar, K., Mischi, M., & Bharath, H. N. (2013). 3-D warped discrete cosine transform for MRI image compression. Biomedical signal processing and control, 8(1), 50-58.
Quijas, J., & Fuentes, O. (2014, April). Removing JPEG blocking artifacts using machine learning. In 2014 Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation (pp. 77-80). IEEE.
Datta, D. (2014). Wavelet analysis based estimation of probability density function of wind data. International Journal of Energy, Information and Communications, 5(3), 23-34.
Zhou, Z., Hua, D., Wang, Y., Yan, Q., Li, S., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2013). Improvement of the signal to noise ratio of Lidar echo signal based on wavelet de-noising technique. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 51(8), 961-966.
Ibraheem, M. S., Ahmed, S. Z., Hachicha, K., Hochberg, S., & Garda, P. (2016, February). Medical images compression with clinical diagnostic quality using logarithmic DWT. In 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI) (pp. 402-405). IEEE.
Baviskar, A., Baviskar, J., Mulla, A., Jain, N., & Dave, P. (2016, March). Coded sub band replacement DWT based space image compression. In 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Wasit Journal of Engineering Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
